[Research Round-Up] Thought-Provoking Insights on the State of the CMO

Source:  Lippincott and Bloomberg Media(This month’s Research Round-Up features the CMO Outlook 2026 survey by Lippincott and Bloomberg Media. This research examines several important marketing issues from a unique perspective, and this approach makes the 100-page report well worth reading.)

Lippincott and Bloomberg Media recently published the results of their “CMO Outlook 2026” survey. The objectives of this study were to identify the major challenges today’s CMOs are facing, and to “help marketers see their challenges differently.”

The researchers contend that, while most CMOs face similar high-level challenges, the shape of the challenges faced by an individual CMO and how he or she responds to those challenges are largely determined by the organizational context in which the CMO is working.

About the Survey

The CMO Outlook 2026 survey produced 541 responses from CMOs or equivalent senior marketing leaders. Seventy-one percent (71%) of the respondents identified themselves as the “primary and senior-most marketing decision-maker” in their organization, while 29% said they were “amongst the senior-most marketing decision-makers” in their organization.

Thirty-three percent (33%) of the survey respondents were from the United States and Canada, and the balance were from Europe (22%), Asia-Pacific (22%), Latin America (20%), and the Middle East (2%).

The survey was conducted by NewtonX, an independent B2B market research firm.

Four Types of CMOs

What separates the Lippincott/Bloomberg study from others on similar topics is its focus on how the organizational context in which a CMO works affects the particular challenges they face and the actions they take to respond to those challenges.

The researchers identified four distinct cohorts of CMOs. Two of those cohorts consist of CMOs who are “organizationally empowered,” and the other two cohorts include CMOs who are “organizationally constrained.”

Organizationally empowered CMOs are those working in organizations where the value of marketing  is understood and recognized by the CEO and other senior leaders, and where the CMO can influence the strategic direction of the organization.

Organizationally constrained CMOs are those working in organizations where the strategic value of marketing is not widely recognized, and where marketing is generally viewed as a support function.

The researchers identified two types of organizationally empowered CMOs – Transformation Leaders and Revenue Drivers.

Transformation Leaders – “Transformation Leaders are future-oriented marketers focused on transformation at scale, AI adoption, and long-term capability building . . . these CMOs tend to hold significant strategic authority within their companies and see marketing as a driver of broader business direction.”

Revenue Drivers – “Revenue Drivers are commercially oriented operators focused on measurable growth, demand generation, and business accountability . . . these CMOs have earned organizational trust by speaking the language of performance:  Revenue, pipeline, and attributable impact. They . . . excel at balancing immediate business pressures with longer-term growth mandates.”
The researchers also identified two types of organizationally constrained CMOs – Credibility Builders and Institutional Navigators.
Credibility Builders – “Credibility Builders are marketers fighting to establish credibility and strategic standing within their organizations. More likely to be . . . in organizations where marketing is viewed primarily as sales enablement, these CMOs spend a disproportionate amount of time proving marketing’s value internally.”
Institutional Navigators – “These CMOs often hold respected positions within the business, yet operate in environments slowed by fragmented decision-making, excessive approvals, and rigid structures . . . they are not fighting to earn a seat at the table; they are fighting to make the table move.”
Unfortunately, the study report does not indicate the percentage of survey respondents who fall into each of these four CMO cohorts or what criteria were used to place each respondent in the appropriate cohort.
Other Findings
The Lippincott/Bloomberg study also addresses a range of other important issues. For example, the study report identifies five primary challenges today’s CMOs are facing.
Driving growthNavigating bureaucracyMeasuring impactTechnological enablement in the age of AICulture-based marketing
The study report does not discuss how these challenges were identified, nor does it provide any data supporting their selection. It does include a thoughtful discussion of how CMOs are addressing these five challenges.
*****
The Lippincott/Bloomberg survey report provides several important insights about the “state of the CMO.” While the report does not include some data points that I think should have been included, the views expressed in the report are well-reasoned and thought-provoking. For that reason, I recommend that you take the time to review the full report.

About the Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may also like these